The Social Self


The Nature of The Social Self

  • we like to think that we have a consistent self and stable personality
  • self is constructed, maintained, and negotiated in social settings

Components of Self

  • Individual self – beliefs about yourself as an individual
  • Relational self – beliefs about our identities in specific relationships
  • Collective self – beliefs about our identities as part of a social group

Self schemas – belief based on past experiences about who we are

  • high in extraversion = more self-schema
    • more elaborate beliefs about being extraverted

Self-reference effect – better memory for information related to ourselves

Self-complexity – tendency to define the self in terms of multiple, relatively distinct domains

Origins of The Self

  • sources of self-knowledge:
    • from within us
      • introspection
    • from other people
    • from social groups
    • from situations

Introspection

  • Narrated self: making sense of who we are and how we change
    • construal
  • not necessarily accurate
  • others may predict our behavior just as well as we do

Reflected Self-appraisals

  • beliefs about what others think of one’s self
  • looking glass self
    • people laugh at your jokes you’re funny
    • people praise your academic work you’re a good student
  • we aren’t actually good at predicting what others think of ourselves

Family and Other Socialization Agents

  • Parents, siblings, grandparents, teachers, etc. teach us attitudes and behaviors

  • Birth order

    • older siblings:
      • more dominant, achievement-oriented, conscientious, maintain status quo
    • younger siblings:
      • more agreeable, open to new experiences, rebellious, challenge status quo
    • diversification:
      • siblings may take on different roles to minimize conflicts

Social Comparison

Social comparison theory – people compare themselves to others to evaluate their own opinions, beliefs, and internal states

  • likely to occur when:
    • no clear objective standard
    • have uncertainty about yourself in a particular domain

Motivated comparisons

  • Upward comparison – improve something about yourself
    • role models, people better than you
  • Downward comparison – compare yourself to others that are worse than you so you feel better

1/24/19

Independent Self-Concept

  • prevalent in individualistic societies
  • A person defines themself as an individual person and uniqueness

Interdependent Self-Concept

  • common in collectivist culture
  • More likely to describe themselves in relation to who they are in a group and their role in a community

Within Cultures

Power: powerful people have more independent self concepts than low-power people

  • power allows for autonomy
  • business people in interdependent cultures also tend to have more independent views of the self
  • this power dynamic holds across cultures

Gender and the Self

  • Across cultures, men have more independent, and women have more interdependent views of the self
    • women refer to relationships
    • women more attuned to external social cues, but men more to internal cues

Situationism

  • Our social self changes from one situation to another
  • working self-concept: only a subset of self-knowledge is brought to mind in a particular context
  • what makes us unique in current situtation

Malleability vs Stability

  • Our self is both shifting and stable
    1. Core aspects that are cross-situationally salient
    2. Stable overall self-knowledge but different aspects are salient at different times
    3. Predictable changes stable within situations
      • Trait – the “average” version of you that is relatively stable across time and situations
      • State – How you are in different situations which changes based on context

Self-esteem

  • Self-concept = beliefs about oneself
  • Self-esteem = evaluation of oneself (attitude about oneself)
  • trait vs self
  • changes across time

Sociometer Hypothesis

  • Hunger index of presence or lack of nutrition
  • Self-esteem index of presence of lack of inclusion
    • not important in of itself
  • Social exclusion hurts (literally)

Self-esteem: Good or Bad?

  • everything in moderation
  • inflated egotism

Culture and Self-esteem

  • Universal?
    • no
  • Exposed to different situations:
    • self-esteem motivation vs self-improvement motivation
      • individualists vs. collectivists
      • Japanese: did poorly = persistence
      • Canadians: did well = persistence

Why do we want to evaluate ourselves?

  • self-enhancement
  • Self-verification

Self-Enhancement

  • better-than-average effect
    • most westerners tend to report better than avg. on most traits
    • why?
      • self-serving construals
      • we judge others on what they are like on average and ourselves by what we are like at our best
  • we are motivated to evaluate ourselves positively
  • self-affirmation theory
    • reduces self-serving attributional bias

Self-enhancement is people’s desire to maintain, increase, or protect their self-esteem or self-views.

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Theory

  • Tesser (1988)
  • Motivated to have positive self-esteem
  • Achieved through motivated reasoning
    • reflection (in unimportant domains)
    • comparison (in important domains)

Cultural Differences

  • westerners self-enhance more than East Asians
  • Westerners
    • well-being associated with positive self views
  • East Asians
    • well-being rather associated with interdependent values

Self-Verification

Self-verification theory: People strive for stable, accurate beliefs about the self because of a desire for coherence.

  • allows us to predict outcomes
  • memory is more selective for self-consistent information
    • we want those beliefs confirmed, even if they are negative

Self-Handicapping

  • we might not live up to the public self we’re trying to portray

Self-handicapping: Tendency to engage in self-defeating behavior to prevent others from assuming poor performance due to lack of ability

Self-Regulation

  • likely more important than IQ for academic performance

Self-discrepancy Theory

  • Ideal self - actual self - ought self
    | |
    dejection agitation
    | |
    promotion focus prevention focus

Strength Model of Self-control

  • muscle metaphor
  • limited resource
    • ego depletion (on-going debate)
  • can be trained
  • can be replenished through sleep and sugar