Post-Incident Activities
Forensic Process
- Incident investigation requires analysis techniques designed to reveal the details of what happened
- forensic techniques look closely at the inner workings of devices, operating systems, and applications to reveal a detailed sequence of events
Lessons Learned
Lessons learned activities review security incidents to determine their cause, whether they were avoidable, and how to avoid them in the future.
- starts with a meeting where staff reviews the incident and responses
- must include staff directly involved along with incident handlers
- staff must contribute freely and openly to the discussion
- avoid pointing blame
- focus on improving procedures
- Leadership should manage disciplinary concerns related to staff failing
- follow established procedures separately
- should invoke root cause analysis
- answers crucial questions:
- Who was the adversary? Was the incident insider driven, external, or a combination of both?
- Why was the incident perpetrated? Discuss the motives of the adversary and the data assets they might have targeted.
- When did the incident occur, when was it detected, and how long did it take to contain and eradicate?
- Where did the incident occur (host systems and network segments affected)?
- How did the incident occur? What tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) were employed by the adversary? Were the TTPs known and documented in a knowledge base such as ATT&CK, or were they unique?
- What security controls would have provided better mitigation or improved the response?
- may need to step through the incident timeline to understand:
- what was known
- the reasoning for each decision
- and what options or controls might have been more beneficial to the response
- compile a lessons learned report (LLR)
- aka after action report (AAR)
- An analysis of events that can provide insight into how to improve response and support processes in the future
- should form the basis for incident summary reporting and recommendations
- when writing an LLR, answer the following questions:
- What were the actions taken?
- Is this the best solution? In other words, is the solution a stop gap measure or something that could be reproduced consistently?
- Are there more capable solutions available?
- How did the teams react to the issue? Could it have been solved more quickly or efficiently?
- If the same incident occurred again, how would the response differ?
- Do the answers to these questions require changes in the security policy or an update to the incident response plan? Is a change control process in place that will enable the organization to implement these corrective actions?
Incident Response Plan Update
- update IRPs to include changes from LLR
- updates to IRP required updated training and testing programs