Notes: In some ways, legal citation is a citation system like any other–a set of mechanical rules for how to describe a source. But it has some unusual properties that are worth paying attention to. First, it is a more elaborate system than any other I am aware of, with a variety of unique conventions for what information must be included and how it should be presented. Second, because it is used by practicing lawyers as well as scholars, and because the nature of authority in law is different than in other fields, it serves some goals (such as rapidly indicating why a source is being cited) that other citation systems do not. Peter Martin is a former dean of Cornell Law School and deeply knowledgable about the history and practice of legal citation.
Questions:
How is legal citation different from citation in other fields?
What are the goals of a citation system? How well do the citation systems you have used meet them?
Regardless of how citations are formatted, why does legal scholarship use so many of them?
For background on the history and evolution of the Bluebook and legal citation, see Fred R. Shapiro and Julie Graves Krishnaswami, The Secret History of the Bluebook, 100 Minnesota Law Review 1563 (2016)
Peter Martin’s Citing Legally blog features some outstanding deep dives on the nuances of legal citation.
There have been numerous attempts to automate legal citation. Many of them are badly incomplete, make basic and easily spotted mistakes, or both. The only two software packages that I can recommend are Juris-M (a Zotero fork with a Word plugin) and Hereinafter (a LaTeX package). I have used both, currently use Hereinafter, and can provide pointers and advice on getting started if you would like.